Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a D Business Director who is a medical instruments selling company, and Defendant B is a person who has no specific occupation.

The Defendants, along with E (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day), had access to the Victim G (the 46-year-old) who did not receive money from the F in return of money, and had the victim G (the 46-year-old) who had received money from the F in return for money, and had requested the investigative agency to return money to the F in return money.

Around August 2012, Defendant A introduced to the effect that the victim was a senior public official working in the Cheongdae-dae-dae-gu Ha-gu Ha-gu Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Ha-dong Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Ha and 300 million won Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Had Ha, and Had Ha.).

However, the facts are that the above E was not a senior public official working in the Cheongdae, and even if the victim received 30 million won from the victim, there was no intention or ability to detain the above F and return 300 million won.

In collusion with the above E, the Defendants deceptioned the victim as above, and then acquired three copies of the cashier’s checks issued by the victim at the time and place of time from the victim, thereby deceiving 30 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Witnesses G and E respective legal statements;

1. Complaints, copies of cashier's checks, receipts, and copies of cash custody certificates;

1. Each inquiry letter;