A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the above sentence on May 23, 2014.

1. The Defendant, such as electronic records, was willing to receive a credit card in the victim’s name by using the personal information of the victimized person known while opening a cell phone in the victim C’s name.

On April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) accessed the Defendant’s residence in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu; (b) selected the “application for card” as if the victim applied for a new credit card; (c) entered the name and resident registration number of the victim; and (d) then arbitrarily entered the “C”, “E”, “F”, and “G” in the customer registration number column, into the “G” and “e-mail column, after going through the victim’s cell phone identification process; and (b) entered the victim’s name and resident registration number into the victim’s cell phone name.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged one credit card application form in the name of the victim, who is an electronic record of rights and duties, for the purpose of making administrative affairs smooth.

2. The Defendant sent a credit card application form in the name of the victim C, such as the date, time, place, and paragraph 1, to an employee who may not know the name of the new card in the name of the Co., Ltd., without knowledge of the circumstance, and exercised the electronic records, as if it were the duly formed application form.

3. On April 20, 2015, the criminal defendant against the victim C said on April 20, 2015, in the victim C’s residence of H apartment 102 Dong Dong-dong, Nam-gu, Gwangju, that “The defendant would purchase a middle and high vehicle and sell it to China, and make a profit to China twice as much as possible.” The defendant borrowed 1.5 million won out of the purchase cost of the vehicle.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not know about the sale of the used vehicle to China, so even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the profit by selling the used vehicle to China.

Even if so, the defendant is the above.