The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is erroneous by misapprehending the facts charged or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, even though the Defendant did not have any injury or injury as stated in the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances, the facts charged that the court below duly admitted and investigated evidence can be fully found guilty of the defendant's injury to the victim by committing or pushing the victim, in light of the following circumstances.

1) The victim is relatively consistent and specific with the method and background of the Defendant’s assault from the investigative agency to the court below’s trial, and the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime. 2) The victim testified that he/she appeared in the scene of the crime and appeared in the investigative agency or court of the court below that he/she respondeded to the victim’s above victim’s statement.

3) The injury suffered by the victim also accords with the victim’s statement and its degree of damage. 4) According to the voice recording CD in which the victim recorded the situation at the time of the damage, it is confirmed that the victim made a statement in which he/she made the victim’s remarks against the Defendant’s act of assault with the voice of sudden multiples while the victim took a dispute with the Defendant.

The defendant asserts that the defendant made a false statement in order to keep the recording file of the content that seems damaged even though the victim did not have been abused.

However, the victim's speech was done rapidly in the middle of the horse fighting with the defendant, and it is difficult to view the victim's behavior planned by the victim in light of the situation before and after the above speech.

In addition, the defendant does not take a particular look at the victim's statements.