logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.07.12 2017나62716
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff and KRW 8,089,800.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is the operator of the “F Council” in Busan Shipping Daegu E (hereinafter “instant hospital”) and the doctor who performed a leapment in the Plaintiff on November 26, 2015 and December 17, 2015, and Defendant D is the Plaintiff on November 11, 2015 (hereinafter “the instant first procedure”). Defendant C is an employment of the Plaintiff on November 26, 2015, for the first procedure for leapment (hereinafter “the instant first procedure”); for the first procedure for 2015, “the instant second procedure”; and for the first procedure for 17 December 2015, 2015, “the instant third procedure” and “each procedure for referring to each of the instant treatment.”

나. 원고는 2015. 11. 11. 이 사건 병원에 방문하여 윤곽주사에 관한 상담을 받던 중 2~4주 간격으로 3~5회 시술을 받을 것을 권유받자, 약 2주 간격으로 3회 시술을 받기로 하고, 같은 날 얼굴 양쪽 광대 및 볼, 2015. 11. 26. 및 2015. 12. 17. 얼굴 양쪽 볼살, 광대, 심부볼, 이중턱에 총 3회에 걸쳐 캐뇰라관을 통한 윤곽주사 시술을 받았다.

The composition and capacity of the outer leapment are as follows, which is divided into two sides of the face:

Total 3 of 1 N/S 1 N/S 3, 0.2 GM 0.8 Libya, 0.8 Libya

C. On January 7, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the instant hospital and requested treatment for a hole station without being set up on the luminous and visible side, even after 20 days have elapsed after the third procedure of the instant hospital. Accordingly, on January 7, 2016, the medical personnel of the instant hospital conducted one high frequency treatment and three radic care for the Plaintiff on January 7, 2016, and the same month 25.

On February 27, 2016, the co-Plaintiff B, the husband of the first instance court claimed that the medical personnel of the instant hospital had caused the death of the skin above the left side of the Plaintiff due to each of the instant medical procedures, and demanded compensation therefor.

E. After that, the Plaintiff visited Gpid as a result of the occurrence of the entire face to the scam scam, and on March 2016, the Plaintiff visited Gpid as to the skin scam in the above hospital.

arrow