logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2015.11.26 2013가합4266
하자보수보증금등 청구의소
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant Korea Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd. shall be KRW 424,206,392 and KRW 101,00,000 among them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties to the contract and the contract for warranty of defects are 1) The plaintiff is the 523 units of Jincheon-dong 508 Jincheon-dong 508 (the 446 units of apartment, the 77 units of commercial buildings, and the hereinafter collectively referred to as "the apartment of this case").

(2) For the management of the apartment in this case, the Defendant Daedong Branch Co., Ltd. (the Defendant Daesung Industrial Co., Ltd. was divided and established on June 30, 2010) is an autonomous management organization consisting of occupants. (2) The Defendant Daedong Branch Co., Ltd. (the Defendant Daesung Industrial Co., Ltd. was established by dividing it) under a contract for the new construction of the apartment in this case from Daesung C&C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “S&C”), a project proprietor who constructed and sold the apartment in this case.

3) Grand C&C is Defendant Housing Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Guarantee Co., Ltd”).

3) As to the apartment of this case, each of the warranty insurance contracts as indicated below (hereinafter “instant warranty insurance contract”) with the principal debtor as the B&C and the guaranty creditor as the head of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the principal debtor as the principal debtor, and each of the warranty guarantees is called “O guarantee”.

After conclusion, the guaranty creditor was changed from the head of the 201st month to the Plaintiff. [Attachment 1] The guaranty number No. 10341208-201-0002801 on November 27, 2008 to November 26, 2009 to 20341208-2001-2001-002802 on November 27, 2008 to 20341208-2008-2008 to 05.495,450,06030 on November 26, 208 to 205, 205, 205 to 305.45, 207.45, 208-20341208-2001-000-2008 to 1208-4, 208.

B. The apartment of this case was inspected on November 27, 2008 for the usage inspection and defect of the apartment of this case. The apartment of this case was inspected on November 27, 2008. The part of the apartment of this case to be constructed by the Defendant Daesung Dong-dong Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Daesung Dong”) according to the design drawing is not constructed, or the defective construction or design drawing.

arrow