logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.09 2013가합64682
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. On the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant),

A. Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) KS Construction Co., Ltd., Defendant, and Defendant.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1 of the parties concerned) The plaintiff is a A apartment (8 Dong Dong-dong 539 households, hereinafter referred to as the "the apartment of this case") located in Ilyang-gu, Yongsan-gu B.

(2) In order to manage the apartment of this case, it is the autonomous management body organized by the occupants. (2) The Construction of the Large Name Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Large Name Construction”) is the project proprietor who constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and the Defendant SK Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant SK Construction”) is the company that constructed the apartment of this case, and the Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd.”) is the following.

As described in paragraph (1), the obligation to repair the defects of the apartment of this case was guaranteed.

B. (1) On August 27, 2003, Defendant SK construction concluded a warranty insurance contract with Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. with respect to the instant apartment as indicated below (hereinafter “instant warranty insurance contract”) on the basis of the insured between Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. as the height market, and individually indicated in the following order: (i) the instant warranty insurance contract is indicated as follows: (ii) Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 guarantee insurance contract of this case in the order described below (Ⅰ); (iii)

A) A contract was concluded. The Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance issued a warranty bond with the same content as the same table, and deposited it with the Goyang City Mayor, which is the authority for usage inspection, and the guaranty creditor was determined to be changed to the Plaintiff if the council of occupants’ representatives is composed. [Attachment I] Serial No. 1 C from August 27, 2003 to August 26, 2004 to August 378, 2004 to August 27, 2003 to August 378, 250, 250,000 to August 26, 2005 to August 378, 200, 2000 to August 27, 2000 to August 27, 2000, to August 26, 2003 to August 5, 207, 2006 to August 26, 2008 to August 37, 2005 to August 26, 20008.

arrow