Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant called "D cafeteria" in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall make a false indication of the place of origin, or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

From June 2, 2016 to June 8, 2017, the Defendant purchased a total of KRW 1,241.431km (an amount equivalent to KRW 7,448,584) per kilogram, on a total of KRW 6,000 per kilogram 1 kilogram 1,241.431km (an amount equivalent to KRW 7,448,584) and stored a false indication of origin in the Republic of Korea for a portion of KRW 7,000,000, U.S. pigs for a portion of KRW 984.34km (an amount equivalent to KRW 5,906,040) except for deteriorated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (total purchase quantity of U.S. pigs);

1. Investigation report (total quantities in violation of U.S. swine scrapers);

1. Reporting of investigation results;

1. Detailed details of sales of the members, and a list of total quantities of purchase of American swine and cattle;

1. The order for correction;

1. A copy of a business report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on field pictures violating country of origin labeling;

1. Relevant Article 14 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 (mainly, selection of fines) of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products for criminal facts and the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant committed the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order Act, in light of the following: (a) the public confidence in marking a restaurant food material; (b) the nature of the crime is not weak; and (c) the period in which the Defendant falsely marked the place of origin at the restaurant operated by the Defendant is considerable, is disadvantageous to the