1. The Defendant received KRW 128,00,000 from the Plaintiff at the same time, and simultaneously received KRW 93,719,00 from the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff asserted by the parties, on May 17, 2007, C entered into a sales contract with the defendant for the purchase and sale of real estate in sequence 1, 10, 11, 12, 19, 22, and 1, among the 93,719 square meters of land B and 93,000 square meters of land B and 93,000 square meters of land, which are linked in sequence to the 3,483 square meters of land size and 23,483 square meters of land size and 24, 25, 26, 28, 35, and 23 of land size and 4,516 square meters of land size and 36,37,38,39, 40, 61, 43, 50, 36, and 200, 200, 200, 206, 206, 306, 200.

The defendant argues that there was only a fact that he entered into a sales contract with C, and that he did not enter into a sales contract with the plaintiff for the instant real estate.

2. Following the facts of recognition, the defendant alleged that Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10 (including the provisional number) was forged, but considering the whole purport of the arguments as to the use of Gap evidence Nos. 10-1 through 16, the defendant's seal shall be affixed to the name column of the consent, after considering the explanation as to the use of Gap evidence Nos. 4-1 from Eul to Eul, and the remaining items shall be left in the blank space for the use of the design office, and the other items shall be delivered one of Gap evidence Nos. 4-1; D shall receive the purchase price from Eul as 200,000,000 won as part payment; D shall receive 30,000,000 won as part payment; and it shall be demanded that the plaintiff enter into a sales contract with the plaintiff and the defendant acting on behalf of the defendant.