1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

A. The attached sheet 1, 2, 2. is indicated on the attached sheet among the land size of 1696 square meters in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff owned the land at issue on September 3, 1997, which was awarded a successful bid on September 17, 1997 and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 17, 1997, and owned so far. The Plaintiff owned the land of this case, 169 square meters, C, 169 square meters, 18 square meters, 180 square meters, 180 square meters, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, and 1808 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The Defendant installed a container of 1, 2, 3, 4, 44, 39, 40, 41, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 1 on the ground of 279 square meters attached to (B), 47, 48, 49, 50, 47, and 47, and attached Table 43, 42, 42, 49, 50, 46, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 62, 50,000, 50,000, 50,000, 50,000,000,000,000.

C. Of the instant land, the amount equivalent to the rent from July 1, 2007 to November 30, 2014 on the land above (b), (d), and (e) part of the instant land is KRW 1,760,000 in total, and the amount equivalent to the rent after December 1, 2014 is KRW 24,90 in each month.

[Reasons for Recognition] The entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the result of a request for appraisal by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the principal claim, the Defendant, as the owner of the instant land, sought the removal of interference.