logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.04.26 2013고단1356
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 8, 1993, the Defendant is the owner of A truck, and around December 15:24, 1993, the employees of B violated the restriction on operation by carrying the freight of 11.2 tons on the 4 livestock, exceeding 10 tons of a stable weight, at the outer-dong control inspection room of the Gyeong-dong, Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, North-gun, and the 15:2 tons of the said vehicle.

2. The judgment prosecutor, applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993 and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), where a fine of KRW 200,00 was determined by the summary order of Jan. 27, 1994, but the sentence of KRW 200,00 was determined by the summary order of Jan. 27, 1994, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article, as well as the corporation, is retroactively invalidated by the decision of the Constitutional Court on Dec. 29, 2011.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow