logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.08.04 2017고합141
존속살해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The treatment, custody and custody applicant shall be treated, and stored.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The facts constituting the cause of treatment and custody [criminal facts] Defendant and a person subject to care and custody (hereinafter “Defendant”) received treatment by around six years from March 2017 as a result of editing mental fission. At the time of this case, mental illness had weak ability to distinguish things or make decisions.

From April 10, 2017 to 13:45, the Defendant: (a) from “F” to “F” in the operation of the Victim E (F, 74 years old), the mother located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do; (b) from “F” without any justifiable reason, the Defendant saw the victim’s head head by using a knife and moving the victim’s head into the above knife, leading the victim’s head by hand; and (c) caused the victim to die with a knife, flife, right ear, upper part, upper part, left part, left part, the left part, the left part, etc. by 14 times in total, and caused the victim to die with a knife with a knife.

Accordingly, the defendant murdered the surviving victim.

[Facts of the cause of the medical care and custody] The Defendant is a person who committed a crime corresponding to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment and needs to receive medical treatment at the medical care and custody facility, as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment, when the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Each investigation report and actual survey report;

1. As indicated in the judgment, mental and physical weakness, necessity of treatment and custody, and risk of recidivism: The above evidence and the witness I’s statement, etc. are identified as follows. In other words, the Defendant was hospitalized into a hospital with a mental disorder in which he was first treated at a mental hospital in July 2007 and between July 2007 and October 10. The Defendant was hospitalized in a hospital with a “non-defluent mental disorder” and “public sulfur disorder” from May 201 to the date of the occurrence of the instant case. The Defendant was treated as a “compharmacologic after editing assistance” and the Defendant was treated as a “pharmacologic treatment.”

arrow