logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고합269
특수폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

A person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental disorder, such as a dead-end mental illness, etc., is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions.

피고인은 2016. 1. 25. 18:50 경 피해자 C(41 세) 의 주거지인 서울 마포구 D 아파트 106동 606호 앞에서, 피고인과 같은 아파트에 거주하는 피해자가 하루 종일 쿵쾅거리며 소음을 유발한다는 이유로, 피고인의 집에 있던 위험한 물건인 식칼( 총 길이 32cm, 칼날 길이 20cm)( 증 제 1호) 을 들고 피해자의 집에 찾아가 현관문을 발로 걷어찬 후 피해자가 출입문을 열고 나오자 피해자에게 “ 죽인다.

dratis flat

The Defendant spits a knife with a knife knife, knife a knife that knifes the victim twice, and the victim spits the knife on the face of the seeder. Accordingly, the Defendant carried a knife, which is a dangerous thing, and assaulted the victim.

[Facts of the cause of the medical care and custody] The Defendant is a person who committed the same crime as the criminal facts in a state that he/she lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental disorder such as a physical disorder such as a net-type mental illness, and needs to receive medical treatment at the facilities of the medical care and custody, and is in danger of recidivism.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E-certification and a medical care and custody center's mental appraisal report;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (Submission of suspect's mother's written diagnosis and written application for counseling among North Korean residents);

1. The need for treatment as indicated in the judgment and the risk of recidivism: The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, namely, ① the Defendant conducted a diagnosis at a lutotol hospital from around 2012.

arrow