beta
Text
1. Defendant A Co., Ltd.:
(a) Irons installed on the ground of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.
Reasons
1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or are submitted to the effect that Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 5, Gap evidence No. 6, Gap evidence No. 7, Gap evidence No. 8, Gap evidence No. 9, Gap evidence No. 10, Gap evidence No. 11, Gap evidence No. 12, Gap evidence No. 5, and the plaintiff No. 12 are forged documents. However, considering the results of the inquiry into the Incheon District Court's fact-finding, it is presumed that Gap's name and the second evidence No. 12 (Standard Contract for Private Construction Works) are forged documents. Thus, considering the whole purport of the argument, the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to have been established since the following seals of the defendant corporation Gap's name are recognized to be based on
This is also applicable to Eul evidence 12(Standard Contract for Private Construction Works) and Eul evidence 22(Standard Contract for Private Construction Works).
Gap evidence 17, Eul evidence 5, Eul evidence 12, Eul evidence 22, Eul evidence 25, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 9-1, Eul evidence 9-2, Eul evidence 9-1, and Eul evidence 2 can be acknowledged by adding it to the whole purport of the pleadings.
On August 18, 2010, D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) concluded a mortgage agreement on each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 attached to D (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by Ansan Mutual Savings Bank (hereinafter “Korea National Savings Bank”). As to the instant land as of August 18, 2010, the Suwon District Court received KRW 1,710,000,000, and the debtor’s establishment registration (hereinafter “mortgage No. 1,710,000,000 as to the instant land was completed as of August 18, 2010, the maximum debt amount was KRW 1,710,000,000, with the debtor as the Korea National Savings Bank (hereinafter “E-mortgage”).
B. (1) On August 2, 201, Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) (hereinafter “Defendant A”) had completed the completion plan for the new construction of the instant land-based multi-family house on December 30, 201 between F and D, and the F, respectively, at KRW 1,432,20,000 (excluding value-added tax) and the following special agreements.