(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.08.21 2015고단275 (1)

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.08.21 2015고단275 (1)

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 2014, around 13:20 on December 3, 2014, the Defendant and C drinking alcohol together at the “F” restaurant operated by the victim E located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun, and the Defendant refused to return home to the said restaurant toilet and did so, and without returning home, C was able to avoid a disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as passing through sound, thereby preventing customers from entering the said restaurant.

As a result, the defendant and C interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant and C, upon receiving a report that the Defendant and C would interfere with their duties under the influence of alcohol at the time, date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), demanded the above police officers to return home from the sloping Police Station G District G District, etc., and the Defendant: (a) stated that the above police officers “on time, time, time, time, time, and time,” (hereinafter “the police officers in Korea”); (b) stated that the Defendant and C were able to go home; (c) stated that the Defendant and C were able to go home; (d) stated that the Defendant and C would go home at the driver’s seat; and (d) stated that H would be unable to cross and close the door of the patrol with one hand, and that H would go back from the driver’s seat so that H would not go back to the police officer’s seat; and (d) said, he did not arrest the Defendant and C’s hand back to the police officer’s seat to the police officer’s seat; and (e) led H to assault and return to the police officer’s.

Accordingly, the defendant and C conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of each police protocol to H and E applies 1.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 홍성지원 2015.06.26 2015고단275

-부산지방법원 2019.05.15 2018고단5314

-제주지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고단2084

-의정부지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단2377

-부산지방법원 2015.11.04 2015고단5281