logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고단2084
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2016, at around 00:25, the Defendant: (a) received an inquiry from the slope E belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station D District, which was called for without paying a taxi fee in the influence of alcohol in the presence of C, and received a report while disputing the taxi article, and was solicited to return home; (b) however, the Defendant prevented the Defendant from taking care of the cab article that was prepared within the patrol vehicle, while taking care of the cab article that was drafted within the patrol vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant left the time of "I am inevitably," and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties by police officials in relation to the criminal investigation, etc., by making his/her breast part of his/her breast part of his/her breast part of his/her mother only once by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of investigative data);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which directly assaults the body of the victimized police officer, thereby committing the instant crime. In order to establish the national legal order and eradicate the light of the public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime against the public authority such as obstruction of performance of official duties.

However, the defendant confessions the crime of this case and repents his mistake, the defendant is the first offender who had no record of committing the crime of this case before the crime of this case, the sentencing example in similar cases, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, the degree of violence committed by the defendant to the damaged police officer, the means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case shall be determined as ordered.

arrow