A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is employed in the “E” restaurant operated in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, from the mid-term Police Officer on December 2, 2012 to the mid-term Police Officer on December 2, 2013.

On October 27, 2013, at around 06:00, the Defendant entered the “G convenience store” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, with one copy of the cresh card under the name of D in which D was neglected due care, and around 06:40 on the same day, and then came into the “G convenience store” located in the “G convenience store” located in the “G convenience store” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul. As such, the Defendant collected the said fam card, which was excluded from possession against D’s will, entered the withdrawn amount, 300,000 won, and withdrawn the amount of the withdrawal, and 300,000 won, and used the stolen credit card.

In addition, from that time to December 10, 2013, the Defendant, using the aforementioned method as indicated in the list of crimes in attached Table 16 times in total, withdrawn 5.8 million won in total owned by the victim (ju) Famalybank, Cheonghobash, etc., and stolen each stolen credit card.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on approval for domestic transactions of credit cards;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 70 (1) 3 of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order is that the defendant stolen another person's credit card and received cash service of 5.8 million won or has not agreed with the victim or has restored the damage.

However, the defendant is sentenced to the same punishment as the disposition, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the defendant was living in prison for a period of one month in this case; (b) the amount is not significant; and (c) the defendant