logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.29 2013고단4501
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor at the Jeonju District Court for fraud, etc. on March 23, 2009, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on March 23, 2009. On November 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of two months and one year and six months with prison labor at the Jungju District Court for fraud, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 12, 2014.

The Defendant, “2013 Highest 4501”, was a person who actually operates the “E” and “F” in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, and did not have the intent or ability to pay the price even if the Defendant was supplied with livestock products, such as Chinese rain from the victim G.

Nevertheless, on March 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had H, a representative in the name of F, provide the victim’s employees I with the equipment equivalent to KRW 9,573,920,00,000; (b) had the victim’s employee I pay the remainder immediately until March 30, 2013; and (c) had the victim paid the remainder with the amount of KRW 9,573,920,00,000, including Korea, to be paid by March 30, 2013; and (d) had the victim paid the remainder.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total amount of KRW 7,573,920.

"2013 Highest 4555"

1. The Defendant against the victim J was operating a distribution company of the mutual name “stock company L” at the Nam-si, Nam-gu, Gyeonggi-do, and conspired with M& with the Defendant to sell the salted fish at a low price and to escape without paying the salted fish amount to the victim, even if the Defendant was supplied with a scenicly spokeed fish through several times by the victim J. The fact that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount to pay it to the victim even if it was supplied with a scenicly spokeed fish.

On November 15, 2010, the Defendant calls to the staff in charge of the N in charge of the operation of the victim J and makes a false statement to the effect that “on the 15th day of each month when supplying the salted fish, the Defendant would settle it on the 25th day of each month.”

arrow