Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is engaged in the agriculture of the instant facts charged, and is 10 degree of 10-year death in the village, such as the victim C.
On January 16, 2016, the Defendant and F (G) were found to be suitable for the land at the location of nine residents, including village residents E, within the community community center, public around 16:00 p.m., and at the time, he was found to be erroneous in the victim’s horses, “I do not have any influence on his hand, such as laddy,” and “I will see the Defendant’s wrong fact at the victim’s end, i.e., “I do not have any influence on his hand, such as lady.”
Republic of Korea Data
“The year to which the end of this year would have occurred” and “the year to which the victim would be openly insulting” continued to read “the year to which the opening of the same year would be similar.”
2. Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 312 subparag. 1 of the Criminal Act (Revocation of a complaint filed by a victim after the institution of public prosecution in this case)