1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

With respect to accidents listed in attached Table 1, each insurance contract listed in attached Form 2 shall be made.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to the submission or addition of the following, and therefore, the judgment of the first instance is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second and third main deeds in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to "the main office and counterclaim shall be deemed both."

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance "this case insurance contract" in the second 12th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "each insurance contract of this case".

The third written judgment of the court of first instance shall be executed by cutting "2." into "4."

The "Sule lecture" at the bottom of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be raised with a "sulous lecture".

The Defendant’s “Defendant C” at the 3rd lower end of the judgment of the first instance court added “The Defendant C delegated all of the rights of Defendant C arising out of the insurance contract to Defendant B on March 6, 2017 in relation to the instant accident of the Deceased.”

2. Determination on the main claim

A. The court's explanation on this part of the parties' assertion is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (from the second to the sixth two sides), and thus, this part is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. In a case where the authenticity of a settlement contract is recognized, the existence of a legal act in its content must be recognized unless there are special circumstances acceptable, even if the existence and content of the expression of intent indicated in the document is obvious and acceptable.

(2) In light of the above legal principles, the parties to a contract are not bound by the parties to a contract at the time of the formation of a settlement contract, and the parties to a contract at the time of the formation of a settlement contract at the time of the formation of the settlement contract at the time of the settlement contract at the time of the formation of the settlement contract at the time of the settlement contract at the time of the formation of the settlement contract at the time of the settlement contract at the time of the

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 92Da25335, Sept. 22, 1992). This case’s memorandum is followed.