A. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud)

(b) Fraud;

C. Violation of the Act on the Regulation of Conducting Fund-Raising Business without Permission

A

Defendant

Law Firm B

Attorney C, D, AJE, AJK, AJL

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Do1850 Decided January 29, 2016

8,2016. 29

The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of the modified facts charged on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the regulation of the act of fund-raising and fund-raising

Justices Lee Jae-soo

Justices Kim Yong-deok

The Chief Justice Kim Jae-young

Justices Lee Dong-won