logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.01.14 2020가단5060891
손해배상(기)
Text

Defendant C’s KRW 78,070,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual significance from April 29, 2019 to November 29, 2020.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building D’s ground (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned building”) in Jung-gu, Seoul, and Defendant B was the owner of the building E in Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant B-owned building”) adjacent to the Plaintiff’s ownership at the time of the instant fire as indicated in B below.

On the other hand, at the time of the occurrence of the instant fire, Defendant C occupied and used the Defendant B-owned building as a lessee who leased the Defendant B-owned building from Defendant B.

B. On April 29, 2019, around 14:58, a fire was generated in the second floor part of the Defendant B-owned building (hereinafter “instant fire”) and the Plaintiff’s building that was adjacent to the fire caused by the said fire was destroyed by a fire.

(c)

The Seoul Central Fire Department’s opinion on the investigation of the fire of this case and the causes of the fire is as follows.

Review of the point of birth: In light of the witness’s statement, the initial witness’s early witness, the type of burning, the process of burning, and the burning of combustible materials, etc., the point of birth is judged to be shotry from the laund of the laund of the laund which was placed on the right side of the kitchen entrance and used on the right side of the kitchen, and the examination of the cause of fire that was not identified in other places such as laundry or burning phenomena, etc. related to the laundry is observed at the laund of the laundry found at the point of primary combustion, and the possibility of the laundry by electric causes is not ruled out as well. laundrying the laundry may be carried out in a way that the resident purchased 5,000 won in a distance from the roadside to 4 years before the use of the used goods before it, and it was also well-grounded that it was not consistent with the situation.

When it is determined that the laundry which was destroyed within the laundry is observed in the state where the laundry power plant is seen as a multi-modal outlet, and the damaged laundry is observed.

arrow