logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.24 2018나49378
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following amount.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 11, 201, the Plaintiff entered into four insurance contracts with respect to Edong, Fdong, Gdong, Hdong, and property located in Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-si (hereinafter “instant building”) as of January 11, 201, setting the insurance coverage amount to KRW 60,000,000 for each Edong, Fdong, and G Dong building as of January 11, 201, respectively, and KRW 300,000,000 for goods and other liability for compensation, respectively.

B. On March 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) leased Gdong from C to KRW 10,000,000 for lease deposit; and (b) leased KRW 1,300,000 for the rent month; and (c) operated the Stewardship Factory.

C. On January 27, 2018, a fire from the Gdong (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred inside the instant building, and the Fdong and Hdong among the instant buildings adjoining not only the said Gdong but also the instant building were entirely removed, and the part of the E Dong wall and the roof were partly destroyed.

The following results of the survey on the fire site of the fire site of this case were presented for the location of the fire extinguishment and the cause of the fire.

The summary point: The main cause of an presumed fire in K building: The possibility of an outbreak due to electrical factors can not be confirmed because the main breaker of the main breaker of the main breaker of the K building is confirmed and the main breaker of the main breaker cannot be specified; however, the possibility of an outbreak due to electrical factors can not be confirmed; the office and toilets of the gate structure are collapsed and it is difficult to detect such as identification; and the point determined by the point of an outbreak and the point of a combustion expansion due to the cause and the point of a fire that can not be identified (scams, etc.) because it is impossible to secure physical evidence (scams, etc.) related to an outbreak, such as the fact that the office and toilets of the gate structure are collapsed and it is difficult to identify the combustion-related devices: the possibility of an examination that caused a fire in neighboring buildings such as M and N due to the heat is presumed to be part of the fire that caused the fire:

arrow