2017 Highest 639 Customs Violation

1. Civil ○○ (79 - 1), and non-permanent,

Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, 18-ro

Seoul National Cemetery District before the place of registration

2. Maternal knives (52 - 1), and non-permanents;

Housing Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dualkro 27 Street

Seoul National Cemetery District before the place of registration

Kim-Woo (Lawsuits) and Park-Woo (Trial)

Attorney Cho Il-ri (Korean Charter for the Defendants)

March 16, 2017

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for 2 years from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendant 1 is ordered to be put on probation in relation to clocks of Defendant.

Seized evidence No. 2 shall be confiscated from Defendant 1’s immigration control.

Defendant 3, 360, 604, and 00 won from Defendant ○○○, respectively, and KRW 3,622, 974, and 700 from Defendant c, c, 622, 974, respectively.

2. Collection:

Facts of crime

When anyone intends to import, export or return goods, he/she shall report to the head of a customs office the name, standard, quantity and price of the relevant goods, and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree.

1. Defendant private ○○

(a) Import of smuggling;

The Defendant, on January 16, 2017, resisting to the port of five gold bars from the mutual influent telecom in the Chinese fluence.

넣어 은닉한 다음 중국 ○○ 공항에서 중국동방항공 * * * * * 편에 탑승하여 인천 중구 공 항로에 있는 ◎◎◎◎ 공항에 입국하면서 위 금괴 5개를 세관에 신고하지 않고 입국하 려다 세관공무원에 적발되어 시가 합계 50 , 893 , 700원 상당 금괴 5개 ( 약 1kg , 물품 원 가 합계 33 , 538 , 948원 ) 를 밀수입하려다 미수에 그쳤다 .

In addition, from July 14, 2015 to January 16, 2017, the Defendant attempted to import or smuggling in China a sum of 2,797,087,700 won (total cost of goods 1,843, 280, 794 won) over 60 occasions, as shown in attached Table 1 of Crimes List 1, from around July 14, 2015 to around January 16, 2017.

(b) Exports;

피고인은 2016 . 2 . 24 . 성남시에 있는 빌라에서 금괴 5개를 항문에 넣어 은닉한 다음 인천 중구 공항로에 있는 ◎◎◎◎ 공항에서 위 금괴 5개를 세관에 신고하지 않고 대한 항공 00000편에 탑승하여 일본 도쿄에 있는 공항으로 출국하여 시가 합계 48 , 140 , 000원 상당 금괴 5개 ( 약 1kg , 물품 원가 합계 48 , 140 , 000원 ) 를 한국에서 일본으 로 밀수출하였다 .

The Defendant, in addition to this, from February 24, 2016 to May 31, 2016, the total market price of 614, 410, and 13 km equivalent to 100 won (the total cost of goods) over 13 occasions, as shown in the attached Table 2 of Crimes List 2, from around February 24, 201 to May 31, 2016.

614, 410, 000) exported smuggling from Korea to Japan.

2. The defendant clocks;

(a) Import of smuggling;

피고인은 2017 . 1 . 16 . 중국 연태에 있는 상호 불상의 모텔에서 금괴 5개를 항문에 넣어 은닉한 다음 중국 ○○ 공항에서 중국동방항공 * * * * * 편에 탑승하여 인천 중구 공 항로에 있는 ◎◎◎◎공항에 입국하면서 위 금괴 5개를 세관에 신고하지 않고 입국하 여 시가 합계 50 , 893 , 700원 상당 금괴 5개 ( 약 1kg , 물품 원가 합계 33 , 538 , 948원 ) 를 밀 수입을 하였다 .

The Defendant, in addition to this, from August 6, 2015 to January 16, 2017, the total market price of 3,059, 294, and 700 gold bars equivalent to 65kg (the total cost of goods) over 65 times, as shown in attached Table 3 of the Crimes List 3 from around August 6, 2015 to January 16, 2017.

2 , 016, 075, 207 won) imported smuggling from China to Korea.

(b) Exports;

피고인은 2016 . 2 . 24 . 성남시에 있는 빌라에서 금괴 5개를 항문에 넣어 은닉한 다 음 인천 중구 공항로에 있는 ◎◎◎◎공항에서 위 금괴 5개를 세관에 신고하지 않고 대한항공 00000편에 탑승하여 일본 도쿄에 있는 공항으로 출국하여 시가 합계 48 , 140 , 000원 상당 금괴 5개 ( 약 1kg , 물품 원가 합계 48 , 140 , 000원 ) 를 한국에서 일본으 로 밀수출하였다 .

In addition, the Defendant exported from February 24, 2016 to April 19, 2016, the total market price of 563,680, and 12 km (the total cost of goods 563,680,000, and KRW 00) in Korea over 12 occasions, as shown in attached Table 4 of Crimes List 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A written appraisal of specific goods, each written appraisal;

1.Each investigation report;

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the selection of punishment for the crime;

A. The Defendants: Articles 269(2)1, 241(1)(a) and 241(2)(a) of the Customs Act, each of them in Sub-Section

Articles 269(3)1, 241(1)(a)(a) and 269(3)(a)(a) of the Tax Act and each choice of imprisonment

(b) Defendant ○○: Articles 271(2), 269(2)1 and 241(1) of the Customs Act (Smuggling)

(2) In the case of attempted import, the choice of imprisonment

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Suspension of execution;

Defendant Mad Private Madle: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Probation;

Defendant Mad Private Madle: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. Confiscation;

Defendant ○○: Article 282(2) of the Customs Act

1. Additional collection:

Article 282(3) and main sentence of Article 282(2) of each Customs Act

Reasons for sentencing

Although the value and size of goods imported and exported are reasonable in light of the frequency of crimes and the method of crimes, etc., the Defendants were not in good quality, the Defendants faithfully cooperate with the investigation by recognizing their mistakes from the investigation process. The Defendants were first offenders, the Defendants did not have much profits from the Defendants’ profits, and other circumstances, including the Defendants’ relation, age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of crimes, and the conditions for sentencing indicated in the records, such as the following circumstances, are determined as ordered.

Judges Lee Dong-soo

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.

A person shall be appointed.