logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2011.09.07 2010고단710
의료법위반 등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the president in the third floor of the building in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the defendant B was the assistant nurse of the above hospital.

No person, other than a medical person, shall conduct medical practice, and no medical person shall conduct any medical practice other than those licensed, and an assistant nurse may conduct only nursing assistance and medical treatment assistance.

Defendant

A around March 27, 2007, around 2007, the victim G who was found to receive Hubucks management from the above F F F-related non-bucks in order to perform HPL procedures (the operation of injecting the local disdefluent drug into the local floor) and to prevent infections or damage to skin transfusions caused by medication, the doctor ordered Defendant B, an assistant nurse, to conduct scam and HPL procedures directly for the victim, although it is reasonable for Defendant A to conduct scam and hPL procedures. Defendant B, upon the direction of Defendant A, performed HPL procedures by administering drugs to the victim in both bucks and hPL places, from that time to June 15, 2007, Defendant B directly conducted HPL procedures on both bucks and parts of the victim, respectively.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to perform medical practice beyond the possible range of Defendant B’s medical practice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect by some prosecutors against the Defendants

1. Protocol of each police statement concerning G;

1. A literature list;

1. Application of statutes on medical records;

1. Article 87 (1) 2 and Article 27 (1) of the Medical Service Act and Article 30 of the Criminal Act for the relevant criminal facts and for the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. As to the assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the Defendants), the Defendants were to conduct a HPL procedure according to the specific direction of Defendant A, a doctor of Defendant B, and these procedures are to be conducted by a nurse or assistant nurse who is not a doctor.

arrow