logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.04.29 2016고단283
출입국관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, for eight months, and for six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

provided, however, that the defendant B, .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) No person who violates the immigration control regulations following false invitation shall invite an alien by fraudulent means, such as making a false entry of the fact or providing a personal reference, to allow the alien to enter the Republic of Korea;

Nevertheless, around January 12, 2016, the Defendant accepted the request from the foreign F of Indonesian nationality to request the Republic of Korea to offer the first and the departure guarantee in the name of the travel agency so that Indonesia persons who intend to be employed in the Republic of Korea may enter Jeju-do. On January 27, 2016, the Defendant entered the Jeju International Airport Entry Chapter 2, which is located at the airport in Jeju-si, Jeju-do around January 27, 2016, the above Indonesia F as well as the above Indonesia F in the process of examining the entry into the Republic of Korea of 28 Indonesia as indicated in the Schedule of Attached Crimes (1) and submitted it to the Jeju Immigration Office, stating that the above persons want to depart from the Republic of Korea on January 31, 2016, knowing that they want to engage in employment activities within the Republic of Korea.

As a result, the Defendant invited 28 Indonesia to write false facts.

(b) No person who violates the immigration control by illegally arranging employment of foreigners shall arrange or solicit the employment of foreigners who have no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, on February 1, 2016, the Defendant provided “I” office in Jeju-do, which entered Jeju-do without a visa for tourism purposes, to C, which is a foreigner of Indonesian nationality, who entered Jeju-do without a visa, and requested to provide employment for employment. From that time to February 5, 2016, the Defendant provided nine employees of Indonesian nationality foreigners who entered Jeju-do without a visa for tourism purposes as indicated in attached Table (2).

arrow