beta
Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On July 14, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the injury case No. 5 of the Daegu District Court No. 2016 and No. 707.
Defendant’s “At that time, the Defendant has the right to assault the Defendant’s home-booming engineer.”
“The assault was not deemed to have been assaulted” on the drinking of “.”
It is difficult to see that a door-to-door engineer was inside and outside, so far as he was crypted and stuffed, and there is no problem that a door-to-door engineer is frighted.
The answer was made to the purport that “......”
However, in fact, the defendant considered that the defendant's chest part of the chest of a home pilot in the guard room was cut back one time by hand.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Court rulings (2016 High Court Decisions 707Da2016, 707), reports on occurrence (Assault) and diagnosis of injury, three times in the public trial records, each protocol of examination of witness (D, A, E), and application of each recording document to statutes;
1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act that selects a punishment;
1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 to be suspended;
1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (in addition to the punishment of a fine that is minor twice, the Defendant has no record of being punished for life in addition to the punishment that is minor, and contrary to the mistake by recognizing the instant crime.
On January 2016, there are reasons to consider the circumstances of the instant crime, such as receiving diagnosis of the old dementia of the punishment of Albi-Wi-Wi-Wi's old-age.
The defendant's perjury statement eventually did not affect the trial result of the injury case against C.
Comprehensively taking account of all such circumstances, the circumstances of the past is remarkable.