Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2015, the Defendant was present at the court of Daegu District Court No. 31 located in Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 364 on July 1, 2015 as a witness, and the Defendant was present at the above court of 2015 and 337 B.

Defendant 7 criminal sole presiding judge of the above court in the trial of the above case, and the prosecutor’s “I do not have to go beyond C in such circumstances, and there is no fact of go beyond C.

I, at that time, do not seem to have been reported to the police station.

I did not go beyond this point to the question "I am I am I am I am I am."

“Written answer,” and “I am about its situation from this point of view.”

I refer to the question, "C.".

The answer to “I”, and “Is no longer than Isar in fact.”

“At that time, I did not have any question at this point.”

The testimony was made to the effect that the victim C was not less than the victim C due to the assault in B.

However, in fact, the defendant did not witness the whole of the police officers dispatched at the time until the dispute between B and C is closed for the reason that he did not see the place in order to leave the place.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness;

1. Copy of the police statement made to A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which led to the defendant's late committing the instant crime, was the fact that the defendant's perjury did not affect the defendant's trial result of the Defendant's case against B, and that it did not affect the defendant's age, sexual behavior, intelligence.