logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.10 2013고정1136
향토예비군설치법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2013 High Court 1136" is a member of the homeland reserve forces belonging to three letters. A.

From October 29, 2012 to November 15, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for education in the name of the 6339 commander of the Army that received “12-year supplementary training (30 hours) for the second time training (30 hours),” which was conducted in the 639 unit of the Army located in 26-2, Seo-gu, Seonam-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan. Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to undergo the above training without justifiable grounds. (b) On October 29, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for education in the name of the 639 unit of the Army that was conducted in the name of the 639 unit of the 26-2 unit of the Army located in the 26-2 unit of the 26-2 unit of the Army located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

The Defendant is the member of the homeland reserve forces. The Defendant is the member of the homeland reserve forces.

On October 4, 2012, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in Seo-gu Busan, and on October 23, 2012, sent a notice of a call for training in the name of the fourth commander of the Army 6339, which caused the second supplementary training (6 hours) conducted at the training site of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the copies of each accusation and each exercise notification;

1. Relevant Article 15 (9) 1 and Article 6 (1) of the Establishment of Homeland Reserve Forces Act, the selection of fines for the crimes and punishment therefor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the provisional payment order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be trained according to religious belief as a “maid witness.”

arrow