logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.07.09 2019구합6349
주거이전비등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,243,943 as well as 5% per annum from July 2, 2019 to July 9, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the deceased C’s son, and the Defendant is the redevelopment and maintenance project association established to implement the housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”) in Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 204.123 square meters (hereinafter “instant rearrangement zone”).

B. On August 28, 2006, the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City, such as the public inspection and announcement of the improvement zone in this case and the designation of the improvement zone, was publicly announced by Ulsan Metropolitan City, and residents and interested parties made public and announcement of the designation of the improvement zone in this case of the project in order to designate the improvement zone in this case. The designation of the improvement zone in this case was publicly announced on August 23, 2007 by the Ulsan Metropolitan City public announcementF in Ulsan Metropolitan City.

C. On January 11, 2016, the Defendant obtained authorization to implement the instant project from the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City to implement the housing redevelopment project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project implementation authorization”) from the head of the Gu, and the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City among Ulsan Metropolitan City was publicly announced as G in Ulsan Metropolitan City on the same day.

The details of the Plaintiff’s transfer, on August 14, 2007, was transferred to Ulsan-gu J apartment I, Ulsan-gu, and August 12, 2009, respectively, in the improvement zone of this case, to Ulsan-gu J, Ulsan-gu, which was located in the improvement zone of this case, and was transferred to the above domicile until April 15, 2019, immediately before the filing of the instant lawsuit.

E. On June 3, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and C with the content that the Plaintiff leases the lease deposit amount of 20,000,000,000, monthly rent of 200,000 (payment on January 10), and the lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, and 5 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion is three months when the project implementation authorization of this case is publicly announced.

arrow