A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2016 Highest 492,” came to know from the victim C (V, 44 years of age) and from May 2013, 2013, and was enrolled in the school from September 2013 to March 2015.

On January 30, 2016, at around 07:13, the Defendant distributed photographs of the victim’s body by transmitting written messages to E’s cell phone, the president of the company where the victim was employed by the victim, who was taken by the victim at the time of teaching the victim’s sexual organ and body pictures with his/her consent at the time of teaching the victim, to E’s cell phone, which is the president of the company where the victim was employed, which might cause sexual humiliation or shame.

The Defendant, “2016 Highest 1016, 1016,” was a victim C (V, 44 years of age) and approximately two years of internal relationship, and around March 2015, the injured person obstructed the mobile phone, F, G, etc. of the Defendant to hedge against the Defendant.

1. Intimidation;

A. On January 10, 2016, at the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu H, Daegu-gu, the Defendant made it clear that “The most dangerous thing is to block telecommunications, without knowledge of that moment,” using a computer.

I find a person to receive a return of Dogri after being subject to an apology against Dogri.

It is intended to deliver all the contents to that person without any method or method.

It shall be clearly known that it is not sufficient if it is not excessive.

If we accept a fluor without any excess, we will also see that there will be a fatal cause for C to cover all the circumstances, even if any means and method will be used.

After making up and printing a letter "," and then sending it to the victim's office mail in Daegu Suwon-gu I2 apartment complex I2.

In other words, the victim was threatened.

B. On January 13, 2016, the Defendant was aware of the Defendant’s residence, such as the entry of No. 1’s (a) around January 13, 2016, using a computer, of “a simple simple correspondence and happy at the present two pages of communication”

8.2.3