A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for 18 years.

The excessive knife (No. 1), excessive knife (No. 2), and papered.

Punishment of the crime

After the Defendant married on July 1, 192 with the victim B (n, 50 years of age) and on October 27, 2015, the Defendant married on October 28, 2015 with C, but on October 28, 2015, the Defendant exercised violence, such as inflicting knife on the road, and divorced on June 28, 2016.

Since then, the Defendant livedd with the victim again, but from September 2016 to March 2018, the Defendant used violence, which was suspected of the victim’s external appearance, and the victim went out around May 2018. On or around June 7, 2019, the Defendant reported a marriage for the unity of adjudication with the victim, but the Defendant declared that the victim would not return to the house while refusing to comply with adjudication.

The defendant, using a computer, tried to see that he she saw that he saw that he saw that she was satisfying so far, or that she was satisfying that she was satisfying so far, and that she was satisfying so that she was satisfying, and that she was well satisfying. This letter was able to satisfying all her security face, but she was frightening so that she was unsatisfying and D was satisfying so that she was unsatisfying, and she did not know that she was patfy, so she did not she did so she she, and she asked her to satisfy, if she refused to she, she would die the victim if she was satisfying, and she prepared to sat least 23 meters.

At around 20:00 on July 30, 2019, the Defendant was seated in front of a F cafeteria located in Northern-gu, Northern-si, and showed that the Defendant was above the Defendant’s letter to the victim. However, the Defendant was able to make sure that the Defendant would not return to the Defendant’s house, and that the Defendant was able to prepare for the instant letter in advance at the left part of the Defendant’s upper part of the boom, which might occur due to the booming of the instant letter, and the Defendant was able to make up for the instant letter.