beta
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. On October 19, 2013, the facts charged, around 09:50, at the street of the Defendant’s operation of the Damma-gu, Young-gu, Young-si, for the victim E to have the Defendant parked a Fpppppon vehicle in the front parking lot of the said place, thereby demanding the Defendant to move or park the vehicle, and thus, during the dispute at a time, the victim’s fponing fpon vehicle was committed by assaulting the victim, such as cutting down the fpon bat, cutting down the bats of the victim’s right-hand bridge, and then, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the part of the fpon c
2. The judgment of the Defendant consistently denied the facts charged in the investigation agency and the court, where the victim’s bridge was strokeed by cutting down the bridge, and the victim’s bridge was stroke.
The victim's statement and the injury diagnosis statement are admissible in line with the facts charged of this case.
At the time, the part of the victim’s statement that the Defendant exceeded the Defendant’s shoulder, and the Defendant was off on his own vehicle “at the time of sulpule,” and that dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump was denied by the Defendant’s fump, and it is difficult to believe in light of the fact that the Defendant was on the part of her mother (six years old) and her
The part of the victim's statement (after assault) that "exploss were taken, but the bones was turned to the playground due to the supervision of the mouth of the relevant year, but did not run away, and only gave instructions to the playground without running it." The victim's statement that "at the next day of the instant case, he/she satis on the bridge and maintained it for 20 days at the hospital." is difficult to believe in light of the victim's statement that the victim was catd together with adults around 09:45 am on the day following the instant case (CCTV photograph, video CD and Defendant's statement).
As above, the credibility of the victim's statement concerning the situation before and after the assault cannot be recognized, the victim's statement also shows that the defendant was pushed down with the victim's right bridge.