A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall borrow or lend a means of access in receiving, demanding or promising any compensation;

Nevertheless, on July 15, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal from a person who has no personal credit company on his/her name to the effect that he/she would withdraw interest and lend money when he/she keeps in his/her custody if he/she forwards the check to be used for the payment of interest.” On the same day, the Defendant sent the check card connected to the Defendant’s bank account in his/her name under the name of Kwikset through Kwikset’s service, and sent the password through Kakao Stockholm.

As a result, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. At around 16:15 on July 18, 2019, the Defendant withdrawn the amount of singishing damage from the points of the D Bank located in the Namyang-si F.

At around 18:00 of the same day, he/she was arrested as a flagrant offender in fraud, and was transferred to the investigation office of the Namyang Police Station and the intelligence team office, and the above police officer in charge of the above case signed the signature of the third party C on the “Woo” column of the letter of confirmation, who received a letter of arrest of flagrant offender from the police officer in charge of the above case, forged the signature of the third party,

B. At around 16:30 of the same day as the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) entered C’s personal information in the investigation of the Namyang Police Station and the intelligence team office in the foregoing case; (b) forged the signature of another person; and (c) submitted it to the police officer for the aforementioned police officer.

3. The Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document presents his/her driver’s license to C in the name of the Commissioner of the Gangwon-do Police Agency, which is an official document in charge and was in possession of the person who was requested to present his/her identification card, on the same date and at the same place as that of the preceding paragraph.