logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고정2012
의료법위반
Text

Defendant

D Each fine of KRW 2,00,00,00, Defendant A, B, and C shall be punished by each fine of KRW 300,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Although Defendant D’s non-defendants and the Defendant was unable to establish massage parlors, the Defendant did not obtain recognition of a massage club from the competent Mayor/Do Governor. From February 3, 2015 to March 24, 2015, the Defendant installed facilities, such as “H” on the fourth floor of Seoul Building, “H” in the 4th floor of the Seoul Building, “H” and “H”, “H” and “A” and other employees provided massage services against customers, and opened massage parlors by receiving KRW 45,000 from customers as the price for telegraphing.

2. Although Defendant A was not accredited by the competent Mayor/Do Governor, the Defendant served as an employee of the said H Morse shop from March 2, 2015 to March 24, 2015, Defendant A provided a general pressure treatment for customers, such as taking care of, or taking care of, telegraph, including a bridge, etc., and receiving 50% of the fee for massage.

3. Although Defendant C was not accredited by the competent Mayor/Do Governor, the Defendant worked as an employee of the said H Morsehouse business establishment from March 15, 2015 to March 24, 2015, Defendant C provided a general pressure treatment for customers, such as taking care of or taking care of telegraph, including a bridge, etc., and receiving 50% of the fee for massage.

4. Although Defendant B was not accredited by the competent Mayor/Do Governor, the Defendant worked as an employee of the said H Morsehouse business establishment from March 10, 2015 to March 24, 2015, and provided general pressure treatment for customers, such as taking care of or taking care of telegraph, such as saves, legs, etc., and receiving 50% of the fee for massage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written confirmation;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant D: Article 87 (1) 2, Article 82 (3), and Article 33 (2) 1 of the Medical Service Act (Selection of Fines);

B. Defendant A, C, and B: Articles 88 and 82 of the Medical Service Act.

arrow