logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.05.18 2016고정2660
수질및수생태계보전에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person who intends to install facilities discharging wastewater and air pollutants shall report to the competent authorities.

From February 11, 2008 to May 25, 2016, the Defendant operated D, a direct water d, in Gyeonggi-gun-gun, Gyeonggi-do, without reporting to the competent authorities, and operated operation using 10 fibers of 400 liters of internal-use 400 liter, wastewater discharge facilities, and 10 liter of an industrial boiler of 50 liter of an hourly air pollution discharge facilities, and 50 liter of an hourly air boiler and 6 liter of a dliter of 50 metres of an hourly air pollution discharge facilities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Protection of Water Quality and Livelihood in the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts, and Articles 76 subparagraph 2, 33 (1) (the point of operating non-reported wastewater discharging facilities), subparagraph 1 of Article 90 of the Air Quality Conservation Act, Article 23 (1) (the point of operating non-reported air pollution discharging facilities), and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is against and against the Defendant’s attempt to commit the instant crime, and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, even if considering the period of the instant crime and the circumstances leading to the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the amount of fine under the summary order is excessive in view of social damage, etc. caused by the instant crime, and thus, the sentence shall be

arrow