All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the reason for appeal is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable because of the punishment imposed by the court below (the collection of penalty of one year, 150,000 won). The prosecutor asserts that it is too unfeasible and unfair.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflects the defendant, that the defendant has no criminal record and no criminal record of the same kind beyond the suspension of execution, that there is a family member to support, that the defendant's family member and branch members want to leave the defendant's preference.

However, the defendant, while serving as the secretary of a certified judicial scrivener office, has handled more than 25 legal affairs without qualification as an attorney for a long period from 2013 to 2016. The fact that the period and frequency of the crime is not significant, and that the amount of fees received from the crime of this case is not good for the crime of this case, and that it seems that there is a considerable amount of fees paid by the defendant.

When comprehensively considering the above circumstances and the overall sentencing conditions of Article 51 of the Criminal Act as seen in the record and the changes of the instant case, it is not deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.