All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal appealed from the lower court’s punishment (4 months of imprisonment) to the extent that it is unreasonable, and the prosecutor appealed from the lower court’s punishment to the extent that it is too unfasible and unfair.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is a favorable condition to the Defendant that there was no criminal history, as well as once a fine, and that the Defendant recognized his/her mistake and reflected against himself/herself.

On the other hand, it is disadvantageous to the defendant that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim company even though he did not compensate for the damage.

In this context, the victim company did not properly investigate the financial resources of the defendant, and when considering the following circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, the motive and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is not deemed to be too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. The appeal filed by the Defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.