1. The defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs and the incidental appeal against the plaintiff A are all dismissed.

2. The defendant among the costs of lawsuit.

1. Grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows.

2.(a)

3) In addition to using a port as stated in paragraph (2), it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. As such, the part 3 used by the first instance court pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is acceptable. As a result of physical examination on the director of Busan University Hospital, or fact-finding, the result of physical examination on the director of the first instance court’s Incheon University Hospital or the results of physical examination on the director of the Busan University Hospital or fact-finding, as a result of the examination on the body examination on the director of the first instance court’s affiliated Busan University Hospital or the overall purport of the pleadings, the following circumstances are as follows. In other words, it was appraised that the plaintiff A suffered permanent disability of 8.7% due to the accident of this case, the doctor outside the Busan University Hospital and I suffered permanent disability of 8.3% based on indoor workers and 9.7% based on the fact-finding survey on the plaintiff A’s indoor and outdoor labor, and it is insufficient to view that the defendant's physical disability was found to fall under 8.7% of the above A University.

In light of the following circumstances, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the head of the first instance court to the Busan University Hospital or fact inquiry, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the head of the Incheon University Hospital affiliated with the Incheon University Hospital of the first instance court or fact inquiry thereof, and the response to the request for medical care benefits to the President of the National Health Insurance Corporation of the first instance court as to the details of the health insurance, which is recognized in consideration of the whole purport of the pleadings, Eul's evidence 4-1 through 3 and the first instance court's statement.