logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.08.29 2018고단1536
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on February 16, 2017, was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime in a horizontal housing site district district court, and on November 1, 2017, was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime, and the execution of the sentence was completed at a detention house in Suwon District Court on November 1, 2017, on 13 times more.

2. The Defendant stated that, on April 21, 2018, the victim C (n, 54 years of age) operated in Dong-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-si (hereinafter “B”), “The Defendant would have two sons who had retired from Cheongju to 12 years from Cheongju to Ha, and 4.5 million won of Mari-si, I will go back with two Mari-si.” On the 23th day of the same month, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would have been able to reduce the Mari-si from Mari-si, which is located in Dong-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-si, and that “The 4.2 million won of Mari-si was changed to Mari-si.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to use the defendant's money in return for the use of money from the injured party, and did not have any intention or ability to take work in the victim's multilateral side.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 4.2 million won in cash from the injured party.

[The defendant merely received KRW 820,00 in return for the victim's multiples, and did not receive KRW 4.2 million. However, according to CCTV images that the victim's statement, the victim's victim's victim's statement, and the victim's victim sees money in a restaurant, and CCTV images that the defendant saw his/her own bank and flags and flags, etc., the defendant proved that he/she was granted KRW 4.2 million from the damaged person as stated in the crime without any reasonable doubt, and therefore, the above argument is without merit).

1. Statement by the police in relation to C and G;

1. A photograph description (a photograph by cutting CCTV images on the same line before and after committing a crime by the scene or suspect);

1. A photograph description (in cases of money in a restaurant, Myeonk, etc.);

1. A photograph of a CCTV image to be cut;

1. Each CD;

1. Previouss before ruling: A reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (recognating repeated offenses and attaching relevant judgments), each judgment;

arrow