logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.28 2014고단8917
사기등
Text

Defendant

CH in 10 months of imprisonment, Defendant CG’s imprisonment, Defendant BO’s imprisonment in 8 months, and Defendant E’s imprisonment in 6 months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] CT (hereinafter “CT”) purchased a mobile phone device from KT to sell the aforementioned mobile phone device to customers, and at the same time subscribe to KT mobile phone service, and receives 7% of the policy fees and the monthly fee for the customer’s use from KT as monthly management fees. The KT’s agent operating the same amount in the manner of offsetting the debt (such as the cost of the terminal) against KT in lieu of transferring the claim for the mobile phone to the customer. Defendant CH is the actual operator of CT, Defendant CG, and Defendant BO are the head of CT’s business, Defendant CH, Defendant BO, and Defendant EE are the mutual relationship.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant CH, CG’s fabrication of private document, the uttering of a falsified document, and fraud, along with a person operating “EG” and “CV,” the mobile phone sales store, without obtaining permission from the operator of the EH’s personal information, and using a false mobile phone opening in its name without obtaining permission from the operator of the EH’s personal information, and thereby receiving unfair policy fees from the K, a general telecommunications company, and soliciting the Defendants to appear to be offset against the terminal price to be paid by the Defendants to the K.

On January 21, 2013, the Defendants forged private documents, stating “EH” and “EI” column in the customer name column in the “EJ” column in the “EG office located in Seocheon-si Office, the Defendants arbitrarily drafted an application for subscription under the name of EH, a private document concerning rights and obligations, in a manner that they sign the “EH” column and sign the “EI” column in the “EJ” column.

Accordingly, the Defendants are cell phones.

arrow