logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.24 2018고단3017
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 재물 손괴 미수 피고인은 2018. 4. 8. 03:15 경 서울 관악구 C 앞 노상에서 피해자 D 소유의 택시에 승차하였으나, 피고인이 피해자에게 욕설을 하며 목적지를 이야기 하지 않아 피해자로 부터 하차할 것을 요구 받은 것에 화가 나 위 택시에서 내리면서 발로 위 택시의 뒷문을 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to damage a taxi owned by the victim, but did not commit an attempted crime.

2. On April 8, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties on the street around 03:20 on April 8, 2018, at around 03:20, the Defendant was informed of the foregoing D and G’s 'F E’ in front of the “F E’ in Seoul, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and provided a bath to D and G from the police officer, the police officer of the Haak-gu Police Station HH District, the police officer of the Haak-gu Police Station, I and patrolman J.

"In doing so, the above I's arms were cut, teared the police powerer, and assaulted the power of theJ over several times with back to the back.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported duties.

3. On April 8, 2018, around 04:00, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, and the Defendant was unable to continuously avoided disturbance at the K office of the Gwanak-gu Police Station in Seoul Special Metropolitan City on April 8, 2018, at around 04:00, at around 04:00, at around 33, 5:00, the Defendant asked the victim, who is the police officer of the Gwanak Police Station K, to stop against the victim, for about two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against L, I, J, G, or D;

1. Each statement of M, N, andO;

1. Damage to property, and photographs and photographs of damage to police officers;

1. Investigation report (on-site CCTV investigation), investigation report (on-site video photographing-picting act of disturbing suspects);

1. The application of the legislation of the Certificate of Injury.

arrow