logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.26 2019나2005596
징계무효확인청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is that of the first instance court's decision, except for the addition of the court's decision in the following cases, and therefore, it is identical to that of the first instance court's decision under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As seen in the above cited part of the judgment added, it is difficult to view the disciplinary action in this case as abuse of discretionary power because it considerably lacks validity under the social norms, and the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds for appeal to the effect that it is insufficient to reverse the factual recognition or judgment of the above cited part on the basis of the following: (a) evidence No. 9, No. 10, and No. 17, No. 18, and No. 21, No. 10, and No. 17, and No. 18, and No. 21, No. 10

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow