The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant: (a) removed clothes from a place where the victim sawed, and only demanded the apology, and the victim refuses it and runs away from the stairs that he gets a bicycle.

The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by misunderstanding the fact, although it was merely an injury inflicted upon the principal due to his negligence, and the Defendant did not have inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Examining the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, the court below's decision of conviction against the facts charged of this case is just and acceptable, and it cannot be said that there were errors by mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

In addition, examining the defendant's assertion that the defendant's clothes are removed from friendly mountain cited by the victim and that he/she will receive death and compensation therefor as a justifiable act, even according to the defendant's assertion itself, the defendant's assertion itself is merely a victim's side on the road, and the victim's clothes have been infected by friendly mountain. Such circumstance alone does not lead to the victim's tort, and it cannot be said that the victim's driver driving away from friendly mountain and the bicycle is an act that does not go against the social norms.

The defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition