beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On June 12, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Army of the Republic of Korea, and served in the second unit of the 2258 unit of the first company group 15 jointly and severally. 2) On March 20, 2013, the Plaintiff received medical treatment on the symptoms, such as the heat, electric power plant, and the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor.
3.25. In the above Second Mandatory Offices:
4.9. The Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital:
4.11. In the above Second Mandatory Offices:
4. 15. The symptoms, such as high-tensions, customs clearances, have continued to exist in a private hospital.
3 On April 18, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Armed Forces Goyang Hospital to be suspected of being infected A, and had no symptoms to be treated;
4.25. In the above Second Mandatory Offices:
4. 26. The symptoms were not shown to receive each treatment at the Masan Central Hospital.
4) On April 29, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) on the ground of the dust generated from the view at the Atolus Hospital, etc., on the ground of telegraphic red lus (Syemic Lupus Erymatosss, hot body with red light flus; and (b) the instant difference (hereinafter “instant difference”).
receiving a diagnosis that it is doubtful;
5.15.In the Seoul Subdivision Hospital, it has undergone a final diagnosis of the wound in this case;
6.14.14.0
8. Until December 12, 2006, the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital was hospitalized;
5) On August 12, 2013, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on the part of the Plaintiff. (b) On November 12, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State pursuant to Article 6(1) of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State, alleging that “The Plaintiff was discharged from active service upon the instant wound during the performance of duties or education and training directly related to the national security or the protection of the people’s lives and property as a soldier, and thus, the Plaintiff constitutes a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State pursuant to Article 4(1)6 of the same Act.”