The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) in light of the various sentencing conditions in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (the completion of a sexual assault treatment program for three years and 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

Examining the various sentencing conditions of the instant case, the circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the fact that the Defendant was at the time of committing the instant crime, and the fact that there was no past record of criminal punishment other than those sentenced to four times fines; and (b) the fact that there was no past record of criminal punishment.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the Defendant, who is a public official, committed sexual intercourse on two occasions with the victim, whose awareness that the victim, who is a worker, was not aware that he would be in mind of being drunk, in view of the circumstances of the crime, methods of the crime, the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, etc.; the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed due to bad character of the crime; the victim’s act of the Defendant appears to have suffered heavy mental suffering from leave of absence from his workplace and having to undergo mental and medical treatment; and the Defendant continuously sent the victim

The circumstances after the crime are not very good and the victim's family members wanted to punish the defendant, and did not receive a letter from the injured person until the judgment of the court is just because the injured person becomes aware of the pain that makes the injured person leave the situation at the time, and eventually the injured person tried to recover a large quantity of tax exemption and commit suicide.

As above, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing factors favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, such as the age, sex, criminal conduct and environment, family relationship, motive and background of the crime, method of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments in this case, and the lower court, taking into account such sentencing conditions, shall make recommendations set in the applicable sentencing guidelines and sentencing guidelines.