beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2013Nu10931 ( October 25, 2013)
Title
(C) The disposition of this case on the premise that the plaintiff is an oligopolistic shareholder is an oligopolistic shareholder is unlawful, since it is reasonable to see the plaintiff as a second-class shareholder.
Summary
(Main) The Plaintiff’s physical guarantee appears to be an act to assist the Gero-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-morro-mor
Related statutes
Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes: Secondary tax liability of investors under Article 39 of the Framework Act on National Taxes
Cases
2013Du23829 Disposition of revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
KimA
Defendant-Appellee
Head of Guro Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court 2013Nu10931 ( October 25, 2013)
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
The judgment of the court below and the appellate brief all of the records of this case, but the appellant's ground of appeal is not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or it is recognized that there is no reason. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by