1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From January 1, 2007 to September 6, 2013, the Plaintiff served as a tank driver of the Defendant company.

B. At the request of C from May 8, 2008 to November 7, 2011, the Plaintiff traded money with the Defendant on several occasions by using the account in the name of the Plaintiff and his/her family members (ma, E, F, and G), and during that period, the details of money transactions between the Plaintiff and his/her family members and the Defendant’s account under the name of the Plaintiff and his/her family members are as follows.

(1) On May 8, 2008, 10, 10, 10, 200, 200, 100, 100, 200, 100, 200, 100, 200, 200, 10, 100, 100, 20, 10, 100, 20, 100, 20, 10, 100, 20, 100, 20, 10, 100, 10, 20, 100, 10, 10, 100, 10, 100, 20, 100, 100, 200, 200, 30, 100, 100, 300, 200, 300, 200, 205.

2. The fact that the Plaintiff transferred KRW 20,00,000 to the Defendant’s account on September 2, 2010 is as seen earlier. The Plaintiff asserts that even if the Plaintiff lent the above KRW 20,00,000 to the Defendant or even if the lending to the Defendant is not recognized, the expressive representation under Article 126 of the Civil Act is constituted. However, in light of the following circumstances revealed by the facts acknowledged earlier, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is presented.