beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 13, 2009 and November 27, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant as the insured (hereinafter “each insurance contract of this case”).
B. On March 29, 2010, the Defendant: (a) received hospital treatment for 766 days in total, as indicated in attached Table 2 “inpatient treatment” from April 8, 2010 to May 14, 2014, following the diagnosis of the right bed, due to an accident that occurred in mountain, and the Plaintiff’s insurance proceeds; (b) received from the Plaintiff totaling KRW 45,590,000 insurance proceeds under an insurance contract as listed in attached Table 1 List 1 List 1 from May 10 to May 26, 2014; and (c) received from the Plaintiff totaling KRW 8,321,391,391 won (= KRW 45,590,000, KRW 8,321,391, total insurance proceeds under an insurance contract as described in paragraph (2) (= KRW 45,590,00, KRW 321,391).
C. Among the insurance contracts concluded by the Defendant with the Defendant as the insured, the insurance proceeds of each of the instant insurance contracts maintained at the time of conclusion of each of the instant insurance contracts, or received from the insurance companies including the Plaintiff due to the insurance accidents prior to each of the instant insurance contracts (hereinafter “instant insurance accidents”), etc. are as indicated in the attached Table 3 “insurance Company concluding the insurance contracts and receiving the insurance proceeds.”
[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number), and the court's MG damage insurance company, life insurance association, Mmerz fire insurance company, Emerz marine insurance company, Emerimeri fire insurance company, modern marine accident insurance company, Hanelim Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Hanelim Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., Hanelim Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., B hospital, hospital, hospital, and Dmeri departments, the result of the response to the response to the response to the submission of taxation data on the meri tax
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is to purely cope with the Defendant’s risk of his own life, body, etc.