Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with persons whose name is unknown, conspired to operate a commercial sex acts business with the trade name called “F” by leasing Nos. 313 and 509 of the Bupyeong-si Etel in Bupyeong-si.

Accordingly, the Defendants from January 2015 to the Hadman of the same year.

3. From 18:20 to 18:30 to 313 and 509 of the instant officetels, female employees, including G and H, were employed, had them report the Internet advertisement and make telephone reservations, and had them receive 130,000 to 150,000 won as compensation for sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who found, and arrange sexual traffic by allowing them to do the similarity act or sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of H, I, and G by the prosecution;

1. Statement to the Prosecutor's Office;

1. Contracts for the lease of officetels, and F Internet advertising materials for sexual traffic business places;

1. Each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each on-site photographs and seized articles;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Defendant A who selected the sentence of imprisonment: Selection of a fine (such as the first offender and the mere employee)

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Although Defendant A’s reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) reflects his mistake, Defendant A had been punished by a fine of KRW 4 million on September 22, 2014 due to the crime that Defendant A committed an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc., Defendant A again committed the instant crime, and thus, arranged sexual traffic in the instant officetel 509.

In February 29, 2015, an officetel 313 continues to arrange commercial sex acts even though it was discovered.

On March 4, 2015, the fact that it was discovered.