The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a beauty room under the trade name of “D” in the Si interesting City C.

At around 11:30 on February 23, 2012, the Defendant stated that the victim E (nivers, 30 years of age), who was a customer, would be able to take a bath at the screen room, and that the victim, who was able to take a bath, forced the victim to commit an indecent act by force, by inserting both descendants into the victim’s inner part, and inserting the victim’s knife and part on his part.

2. The grounds for dismissing the public prosecution are the facts charged in this case that fall under Article 298 of the Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012); and the facts charged in this case can be prosecuted only upon a complaint filed under Article 306 of the same Act.

According to the records, the victim E can be recognized as having withdrawn the complaint on July 22, 2013, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.